I received a wonderful email last week after my SCGS webinar, "Grandma's Flak Jacket: Why your children need you to do genealogy." The email illustrates so beautifully how nourishing family history is, even when there are hard things going on in your family. Jo-Ann said I could share the letter with you, so here it is. I hope it inspires you as much as it inspired me.
Hi Janet,
I attended your webinar last night (am the one who's
husband's father was one of 22 children... he's also Swedish). I've
attended probably a dozen different webinars over the past year and most
have been very good, but yours was different. I've not felt compelled
to contact a presenter afterwards, but this time I have to. Your talk
touched me like none of the others have.
I come from a very dysfunctional family, with alcoholism, drug
addiction, sadism and lots of irrational (and unsavory) behaviours.
Thusly, there was never any closeness and no one ever talked about
family history. I am 56 years old and about 3 years ago, just on a
whim, I decided to draw up my family tree. I was stuck almost
immediately on my paternal grandfather. My Dad (now deceased) was
entirely unapproachable on the subject, but he had 2 sisters. He was on
good terms with one, but estranged from the other. We were never
allowed to talk to that second sister because she was apparantly so
horrible. Trouble is, the first sister was like him and would not
discuss the family, so my only choice was to approach the second one....
even though I was risking being disowned for doing so. My whole world
changed at that point.
Not only was she not horrible, she was WONDERFUL. She was thrilled
to hear from me and shared openly. She inspired me beyond all belief
and I am eternally grateful to her for that. She is 82 years old and I
regret all those lost years. But it is what it is and at least we can
carry on from here with love instead of resentment and maybe heal some
of those hurts. I guess you could say I am now obsessed with genealogy,
making it practically my full time job. I think what drives me is that
need for connectedness. I have come to believe that I am part of
something much bigger and I finally feel "a part of". I've had some of
those woo-woo moments that you talked about last night and those are
very cool. I absolutely love having made contact with previously
unknown relatives and especially being able to share things with others
that they did not know before. And have put people together that
otherwise may never have found each other, or even known of their
existence.
There was one defining moment, which may sound like nothing, but it
impacted me. My grandfather emigrated from Scotland to Canada. He was
following his sweetheart who had emigrated the year before. They
married, had children and when the Great Depression hit he had to travel
to the other side of the country for work. For various reasons, they
never reunited. Once he landed work he sent for her and the children,
but her family interfered and prevented her from going. Very sad. She
always kept his picture beside her bed until her dying day some 70 years
later. It breaks my heart to even tell this story. But the haunting
question is... whatever happened to him? I have really tried hard to
find him, but so far to no avail. I did trace him to a town in 1935 and
had the strangest sensation when I first saw his name on the printed
page of the City Directory. Nothing earth shattering. Just a phone
book. But it was him. He was real. I felt a connectedness I had never
felt before. Was weird.
I'm still searching for him and will not give up. I don't know what
kind of man he was. I like to believe he was good, even though he had a
brother who was very much NOT good. My Dad and his one sister hated
their father their entire lives because they believe he abandoned the
family, but I don't think they had all the facts. I think they robbed
themselves by not trying to learn and understand why their parents did
what they did. They preferred to carry the hurt. So... because the
trail on grandfather went cold quite quickly, I turned my attention to
his wife's family and have mapped out quite a large tree. Details have
come much more easily and I've made many contacts. Here is where I'm
finding more than just the facts. I'm learning of behaviours and
personality traits and seeing very clear patterns. It really explains
so much of how and why my family (and it's branches) is the way it is.
It allows me to have more compassion.
And physical traits.... there's a whole 'nother fun subject. My
grandmother was from Scotland but her ancestors were from Ireland. Her
surname is rare, so I've been making a one-name study of it and tracing
everyone I find with that name. I have mapped 3 major branches and
traced them all back to the same place and time. I just can't prove the
link, but there have been tip offs. Like pictures of 2 men, each from a
different branch. They look so much alike they could be brothers.
Another story is I found a second or third cousin recently and he sent
me a picture of the GG-grandparents we share. It took my breath away to
see that GGGF and my nephew are spitting images of each other.
This whole subject is awesome, awesome, awesome! I would love to
publish my findings some day, to pass down to future generations. I
often sit and think what life was like for my various ancestors and
picture myself standing beside them in their time. I also wonder what
they would think about how hard I'm working to learn about them. What
would they have thought about someone being so interested in them as
they were just living their ordinary lives. Will someone in the future
be this interested in me and what I am doing today in MY ordinary life?
Anyways, I've written much more than I intended to. I just wanted
to thank you for the webinar and confirming that I'm not the only one
who approaches my research with these same thoughts and intentions. I
don't even know if I've adequately articulated what I am trying to say
to you, but .... thanks.
Jo-Ann (in BC, Canada)
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Grandma's Flak Jacket
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Trefusis part 6--The Archives (And she scores!)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/562c7/562c760b667e87226881bafe843ca31263d32793" alt=""
In the name of God Amen. I John Carpenter of Bradford in the County of Somerset Yeoman, being weak of body but of sound and perfect mind and memory, thanks be given to almighty God for the same do make and ordain this my last will and testament in manner and form following (That is to Say), I recommend my soul into the hands of the Almighty God and my body I commit to the earth to be decently interred according to the discretion of my executor herein after named, and as for such worldly estate as it has pleased God to bestow upon me I go give and bequeath the same in manner following Item I do give desire and bequeath unto my dear and loving wife Sarah the sum of one hundred and twenty pounds lawful money of Great Britain .....
1721!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In the name of God Amen. I Thomas Carpenter of Bradford in the County of Somerset Yeoman being Sick of and weak of Body but of sound and perfect mind and memory, called to mind their mortality of my Flesh and willing to settle what it hath pleased God to bestow upon me in this world do make and ordain this my last will and Testament in manner and form following--thats to say I will that my Debts and Funeral finances be first satisfied and paid. Item I give and desire and bequeath unto my four sons--Nicholas Carpenter, John Carpenter, Thomas Carpenter and my son unbaptized (Intended and deigned to be called and named Robert Carpenter) .....
1753!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Then further into the bundle I found several of these bills of sale where Jane and her children sold off parts of the land. They were beautiful huge documents with all of their signatures and wax seals.
The signature of my 7th great-Grandfather John Carpenter, Jane and Thomas' son.
Labels:
England,
genealinspired,
Janet's genealogy,
Trefusis
Trefusis Part 5 -- Bradford on Tone
And then we were met with this:
The town is beautiful.
And then we headed to the White Horse Inn for a late lunch. We had heard from the proprietor of the hotel in Taunton that the White Horse in was a nice pub. And we found it to be just that. The service was attentive and the food delicious. I can't wait to take the family back. They'll love the proper English Sticky Toffee Pudding.
Tomorrow I'll tell you about our Greatest Find on our ancestor hunt. Stay tuned.
Labels:
England,
genealinspired,
Janet's genealogy,
Trefusis
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Trefusis Part 4--The Farm
Notwithstanding driving on the left side of the road, notwithstanding working with a car unlike anything I'd ever driven, notwithstanding dealing with a
This really is the story of the value of investing your
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c398b/c398b958a5c7009f1f0f57b15fcd8f851fbd2f3c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3957/d3957bffcf7702f0cbd2af8404e5520f2031ee60" alt=""
I'm not sure where my Grandfather's sign ended up, but several years ago, my sister created a similar sign for my father and for herself. So there have been
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfcd8/bfcd85d02bb26d02bc4d4e7c90d7bcab2769bb1c" alt=""
So probably the most fantastic part of my trip to Great Britain was to get a picture of myself next to the "real" Trefusis sign, along the road at the entrance to the farm. I'm fully aware that this would seem a simple picture to most people, but for me it is just hard to put into words. It is something tugging clear back in the back of my heart. Something really exciting and fulfilling. It was as if several generations were conspiring to pull me back there and I had finally been able to surrender to their wishes.
I don't think I was hoping to be invited in for tea, in fact I think I would have been quite uncomfortable imposing on him in any way, shape or form, but I didn't expect someone to be quite so opposed to our presence. Perhaps he felt threatened in some way, I don't know. But I was disappointed to find someone who couldn't be polite and gracious. Oh well. It was still thrilling to be there. He couldn't have put a damper on that no matter what his reaction.
So, despite the farmer, I was thrilled to be able to walk the same roads, and be in the same town that my ancestors inhabited. It is a gorgeous area and I can see why the draw back is so strong. I'll tell you about the town and the beautiful church where so many of my ancestors were married in my next post.
Labels:
England,
genealinspired,
Janet's genealogy,
Trefusis
Sunday, April 8, 2012
Indexing the 1940 census
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9433c/9433c28adf6bfc99f33a00b012629f1d45542b9d" alt=""
12 year old daughter!!
Yeeeeessss!
Letting her do it on my ipad doesn't hurt. It's just more fun on there. I think we've found a great new project for my daughter. Indexing is addictive.
Janet Few--Harnessing the Facebook Generation--a great lecture at WDYTYAL
I had the opportunity to catch a class by Janet Few at Who Do You Think You Are Live 2012. Her title was "Harnessing the Facebook Generation" so you know I had to check that one out. I learned a lot from her perspective.
She geared her remarks to people who were concerned about the future of their family history research. Janet suggested that getting younger people involved were crucial to ensuring the future of your research. Genealogists need to be concerned about making the hobby attractive to the next generation. She conducted a quick survey at the Devon Family History Society stand at the conference on Friday. They asked Who Do You Think You Are Live attendees whether or not they were worried about what would happen to their research ? Two thirds of the people said that, yes, they were concerned that someone would care about it after they were gone. Genealogists should be really concerned about getting the younger generation involved.
Janet was absolutely right when she stated that we need to be asking ourselves why they are not interested. I think Americans are a lot like the British in saying they have other commitments. It was interesting in the difference between the British and American focus on the archives rather than the Internet. In that way I think Americans may have the advantage in attracting the next generation because we are so focused on the Internet rather than going to an archive. I thought it was amusing that she felt one of the excuses young people might use was that visiting the archives was expensive. It is so much less expensive there than it is for an American to travel to visit an archive, especially archive abroad. Perhaps that is an excuse that Americans can use even when they are older.
I found it very refreshing to hear her assert that if they are interested enough they will find the time and money. She is right. We need to focus on making sure they know how fun and interesting it is, and not worry about the particulars. They will figure the particulars out if they are interested. We just have to make it look exciting.
As I went looking for information about involving children in family history throughout this conference I could see she has an uphill battle in England making the genealogists interested in bringing in the next generation. I found responses such as "I was told as a child to be seen and not heard, so I was never allowed to ask questions about my family history," or "We can't very well have children involved in something as complicated as this.". One magazine editor told me that they hadn't published anything about getting children involved because they didn't believe that interested their readers. One of the major concerns that Janet was facing in her audience was, "Does it matter?". To that lack of concern, Janet asked, "Will the gap be too wide when they get interested later?" I had never thought about it this way, but she is absolutely right that when we don't involve the next generation, we are missing the opportunity to bridge that gap together. We need to involve them now so that it won't be so hard for them when they become interested as they become older. She also asserted that we need the tech generation to help us preserve our history. We need them as much as they need us. But we have to present it in a way that is interesting. They aren't interested in doing genealogy the way we do it.
I loved her ideas about the Facebook generation being educated differently and that the way they get info is different than the way older people access information. To attract young genealogists we need to look at the way they access information. I agree with her that they go straight to the Internet and then only sometimes do they ever get to books. I'm not sure that I agree that they are more likely to look for name in Facebook than in google, but she very well may be right. Janet talked about the Braund Family Group on Facebook. She noted that there are 200 members of the society in real life, and 200 members on facebook, but only 40 of the actual members are members on facebook--thus the facebook group attracted 160 people to their cause. Of those, she estimated that 108 are estimated to be under 30 years old. She spoke of her experiences as a young family historian. She said when she joined the Braund One Name Society, at the age of 30 she was one of 4 young members and she was amused to find that 24 years later she was still one of the youngest members. She was excited to have the society on Facebook, and felt that this was the place where most young people would go to search for information about their family. She feels that Facebook is the best way to talk to youth. Though social networking isn't a substitute for a mailing list or blog, she also noted that a local journalist was following them on twitter, yea--free publicity. But does it really help your research? For youth, a facebook group is a great place to ask questions. It is also a great place to share photos and info.
Janet had some great examples of getting younger people involved with their family history. The first, is a children's website put together by the Devon Family History Society, the Acorn Club. She said you need to ask young people how to develop a website for them. She also showed off Captainjamesbraund.wordpress.com where a doll goes from member of the family to member of the family and writes letters on the blog. Janet also recommended the Horrible Histories TV show on the BBC. We had a great time watching some of the clips on youtube. My favorite is the Tudor Diet Plan. Like I've said here too, you need to do it in a youthful way. If kids were attracted to the way we do genealogy, we'd already have way too many children interested. So we have to rethink. Janet had some great ideas.
Janet's handout can be found at http://www.sog.org.uk/events/pdf/2012-Show-Handouts/WDYTYA-20120226-Harnessing-The-Facebook-Generation.pdf You can bet I'm following her on facebook. You should too.
She geared her remarks to people who were concerned about the future of their family history research. Janet suggested that getting younger people involved were crucial to ensuring the future of your research. Genealogists need to be concerned about making the hobby attractive to the next generation. She conducted a quick survey at the Devon Family History Society stand at the conference on Friday. They asked Who Do You Think You Are Live attendees whether or not they were worried about what would happen to their research ? Two thirds of the people said that, yes, they were concerned that someone would care about it after they were gone. Genealogists should be really concerned about getting the younger generation involved.
Janet was absolutely right when she stated that we need to be asking ourselves why they are not interested. I think Americans are a lot like the British in saying they have other commitments. It was interesting in the difference between the British and American focus on the archives rather than the Internet. In that way I think Americans may have the advantage in attracting the next generation because we are so focused on the Internet rather than going to an archive. I thought it was amusing that she felt one of the excuses young people might use was that visiting the archives was expensive. It is so much less expensive there than it is for an American to travel to visit an archive, especially archive abroad. Perhaps that is an excuse that Americans can use even when they are older.
I found it very refreshing to hear her assert that if they are interested enough they will find the time and money. She is right. We need to focus on making sure they know how fun and interesting it is, and not worry about the particulars. They will figure the particulars out if they are interested. We just have to make it look exciting.
As I went looking for information about involving children in family history throughout this conference I could see she has an uphill battle in England making the genealogists interested in bringing in the next generation. I found responses such as "I was told as a child to be seen and not heard, so I was never allowed to ask questions about my family history," or "We can't very well have children involved in something as complicated as this.". One magazine editor told me that they hadn't published anything about getting children involved because they didn't believe that interested their readers. One of the major concerns that Janet was facing in her audience was, "Does it matter?". To that lack of concern, Janet asked, "Will the gap be too wide when they get interested later?" I had never thought about it this way, but she is absolutely right that when we don't involve the next generation, we are missing the opportunity to bridge that gap together. We need to involve them now so that it won't be so hard for them when they become interested as they become older. She also asserted that we need the tech generation to help us preserve our history. We need them as much as they need us. But we have to present it in a way that is interesting. They aren't interested in doing genealogy the way we do it.
I loved her ideas about the Facebook generation being educated differently and that the way they get info is different than the way older people access information. To attract young genealogists we need to look at the way they access information. I agree with her that they go straight to the Internet and then only sometimes do they ever get to books. I'm not sure that I agree that they are more likely to look for name in Facebook than in google, but she very well may be right. Janet talked about the Braund Family Group on Facebook. She noted that there are 200 members of the society in real life, and 200 members on facebook, but only 40 of the actual members are members on facebook--thus the facebook group attracted 160 people to their cause. Of those, she estimated that 108 are estimated to be under 30 years old. She spoke of her experiences as a young family historian. She said when she joined the Braund One Name Society, at the age of 30 she was one of 4 young members and she was amused to find that 24 years later she was still one of the youngest members. She was excited to have the society on Facebook, and felt that this was the place where most young people would go to search for information about their family. She feels that Facebook is the best way to talk to youth. Though social networking isn't a substitute for a mailing list or blog, she also noted that a local journalist was following them on twitter, yea--free publicity. But does it really help your research? For youth, a facebook group is a great place to ask questions. It is also a great place to share photos and info.
Janet had some great examples of getting younger people involved with their family history. The first, is a children's website put together by the Devon Family History Society, the Acorn Club. She said you need to ask young people how to develop a website for them. She also showed off Captainjamesbraund.wordpress.com where a doll goes from member of the family to member of the family and writes letters on the blog. Janet also recommended the Horrible Histories TV show on the BBC. We had a great time watching some of the clips on youtube. My favorite is the Tudor Diet Plan. Like I've said here too, you need to do it in a youthful way. If kids were attracted to the way we do genealogy, we'd already have way too many children interested. So we have to rethink. Janet had some great ideas.
Janet's handout can be found at http://www.sog.org.uk/events/pdf/2012-Show-Handouts/WDYTYA-20120226-Harnessing-The-Facebook-Generation.pdf You can bet I'm following her on facebook. You should too.
Labels:
children,
England,
social networking,
teenagers,
why genealogy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)